Now, if this carbon dating agrees with other evolutionary methods of determining age, the team could have a real discovery on their hands.
Taken alone, however, the carbon dating is unreliable at best, and at worst, downright inaccurate. Why not post a comment to tell others / the manufacturer and our Editor what you think. Providing the content is approved, your comment will be on screen in less than 24 hours.
Leaving comments on product information and articles can assist with future editorial and article content.
Post questions, thoughts or simply whether you like the content.
The half-life of carbon is 5,730 years, which means that it will take this amount of time for it to reduce from 100g of carbon to 50g – exactly half its original amount.At this point, the carbon dating data is simply disregarded.It has been summed up most succinctly in the words of American neuroscience Professor Bruce Brew: that samples of moss could be brought back to life after being frozen in ice. That carbon dating deemed the moss to have been frozen for over 1,500 years.They attempted to account for this by setting 1950 as a standard year for the ratio of C-12 to C-14, and measuring subsequent findings against that. Other times, the findings will differ slightly, at which point scientists apply so-called ‘correction tables’ to amend the results and eliminate discrepancies.Most concerning, though, is when the carbon dating directly opposes or contradicts other estimates.